CDF Lectured
Home ] Up ] EIR Comment Info ] CDF Loses Fee Appeal ] State Pays $200,000 ] Legislation Moves ] Scoping Alert ] Legislation Introduced ] PD Hatchet ] [ CDF Lectured ] EIR Ruled Invalid ] Press Democrat Bias ] Logging Stay Extended ] Logging Stayed ] Illegal Bids ] Illegal Bids Charged ] Brandon Gulch Protest ] Injunction Denied ] Brandon Gulch Sale ] EIR Suit Filed ] BOF MP Alert ] EIR Lawsuit ] First Lawsuit ] EIR 1 ] Resolution ]


Appeals Court Extends Halt in Jackson State Forest Logging

August 20, 2003            Press Release               For Immediate Release

Contact: Vince Taylor, Ph.D. (707) 937-3001
Paul Carroll (legal) (650) 322-5652

Appeals Court Extends Halt in Jackson State Forest Logging

Tells CDF "Do the job right." Facilitates Appeal of Mendocino Court Decision

August 20, San Francisco. The California Court of Appeals today inserted itself forcefully into contentious and complex litigation on logging of California’s largest state-owned forest, 50,000-acre Jackson State Redwood Forest.

In an unusual action, the Court dispensed with lawyer’s arguments. Instead for nearly half an hour the three judges interrogated and lectured Charles Getz, chief counsel for the California Department of Forestry (CDF). They were openly hostile to CDF’s contention that a lower court’s invalidation of a new management plan did not prevent them from carrying out two disputed logging plans. They told CDF to stop litigating and to get moving on developing a legally valid environmental study.

At the end, the court practically directed the lawyer for the Campaign to Restore Jackson State Redwood Forest, the citizen’s group challenging CDF, to appeal the lower court's failure to enjoin the disputed plans. They extended a previously ordered logging-halt of these two plans until such an appeal could be filed.

Dr. Vince Taylor, Campaign spokesperson, said, "Coming to the Court of Appeals was like coming into a sane world after being in Mendocino in an Alice-in-Wonderland world. CDF’s lawyer, Charles Getz, reinterpreted old agreements, repudiated his clear previous statements, and invented legal arguments out of thin air, to all of which Mendocino Judge Henderson appeared to lend a sympathetic ear. Down was up and up was down.

"Today the Appeals Court told Mr. Getz in no uncertain terms that up was up and down was down. It was a great relief to have sanity affirmed. The Appeals Court clearly intends to provide the public forest the legal protection it deserves."

Today’s action was the latest in a series of court actions, beginning in 1991, that have largely prevented the state from logging of Jackson State Forest. Under a settlement agreement following a court-ordered logging halt in mid-1991, the state agreed to do no further logging until it had prepared a new management plan and environmental study. Prior to the court action, CDF had routinely been generating profits of $10-15 million per year from large-scale logging of the forest under a management plan last updated in 1983. The Campaign successfully contended that environmental circumstances had radically changed since 1983 and that state law required an updated plan and environmental study.

The new environmental study was completed in the fall of 2002 and immediately challenged in court again by the Campaign and a new partner, Forests Forever of San Francisco.

In early 2003, CDF moved to begin logging on two large plans covering 900 acres. Dr. Taylor then said, "The Brandon Gulch and Camp 3 logging plans target the oldest and ecologically most valuable redwood stands in the forest – in the heart of the forest’s prime recreation area."

A Mendocino County judge allowed the two logging plans to begin in Jackson Forest even though he said he was very likely to rule in favor of the Campaign and invalidate the Forest’s legally required environmental study. The Campaign then made an emergency request to the Court of Appeals. The Court immediately granted a stay – but not before 1600 80-100 year-old trees were cut.

In late July, the Mendocino Superior Court invalidated the environmental study and new management plan, but he did not explicitly enjoin logging on the two plans that were the halted by the Appeals Court. Following this decision, CDF contended that it could legally move forward on the two logging plans, arguing that the although the new management plan has been invalidated, the 1983 was never ruled invalid.

At the hearing today, Mr. Getz attempted defend the CDF’s ability to carry out the two plans. The judges were openly and unanimously skeptical, asking pointed questions and offering counter arguments to every point raised by Mr. Getz.

At one point, in apparent frustration, a justice asked Mr. Getz, "Why does CDF continue to try to evade and reinterpret previous rulings and agreements? Why doesn’t it just move forward to get a valid EIR [Environmental Impact Report] and management plan?"

When Mr. Getz responded by complaining about the delays created by the litigation and the economic hardship the loss of logging revenue imposed on the state, Chief Justice Haerle, interrupted and said very pointedly and strongly, "In that case, the burden falls on the bureaucracy to do the job right."

The judges then turned to Paul Carroll, lawyer for the Campaign to Restore Jackson State Redwood Forest. The Chief Justice first noted that the Mendocino Superior Court had not issued a final judgement. He then counseled Mr. Carroll that for the Appeals Court to overturn the lower court’s failure to enjoin the two logging plans, he would need to bring an appeal to this court. "Are you planning to appeal?," Justice Haerle asked. When Mr. Carroll finally replied affirmatively, Justice Haerle announced the court’s action for the day:

"The Court defers a decision in this case until after a final judgement is issued by the Mendocino Superior Court. The stay on logging remains in place."

Previous press releases, legal briefs and background on this issue are at