By Kathy Bailey, recently retired
Chair of the Sierra Club Forest Conservation CommitteeJackson
Demonstration State Forest (JDSF) is a 50,000 acre publicly owned forest
near Ft. Bragg, in Mendocino County. A new Management Plan was released
in April, 2001 A second Draft Plan and a Draft Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) was released May 17, 2002. The
public comment period is now open.
The California Department of Forestry (CDF) runs Jackson, and under
the proposed Plan, logging will continue to be the principal focus of the
forest’s management.
Public interest in the forest and comment on the documents
will be key to getting much needed improvements. Comments on both the
draft Plan and the EIR must be received by CDF in Sacramento (see address
below) by 5 PM on July 19.
Background
Jackson Forest is, by far, the largest publicly owned forest in the
redwood region of Mendocino and Sonoma Counties and is one of the largest
tracts of public land in the coastal region north of San Francisco and
south of Humboldt County. There are no federal forestlands in this area.
Within its boundaries a few groves of ancient trees still survive as
do significant stands of 100-year-old second growth forest, Careful
management of Jackson is particularly important because so much of the
area’s natural heritage has already been lost, Aggressive logging on
timber industry-owned lands has driven out wildlife, fouled streams,
eliminated many plant species, reduced bird populations, and nearly
exterminated a once vibrant salmon fishery, Only a three-hour drive from
millions of people in the San Francisco Bay Area, Jackson has a crucial
role in maintaining both the region’s redwood ecosystem and its outdoor
recreation potential,
After years of citizen pressure, in the spring of 2001 CDF released a
draft Management Plan revision, the first since 1983, For those looking
for significant reform, it was a big disappointment, An overwhelming
proportion of the forest continues to be designated for timber
production, A third of the logging is still slated to be "even-aged
management," including clearcutting dressed up under the name "variable
retention." Even-aged logging removes most or all of the older trees, and
variable retention simply means that a few trees or groups of trees are
left after a clearcut, Another third of the logging is designated as
"group selection," mini-clearcuts from 2 ½ acres to 5 acres, Watercourse
protections, wildlife corridors, and old growth development areas are
minimal, Recreation planning is deferred,
CDF has long resisted calls for management change, Reform efforts
since 1996 include civil disobedience and arrests; public meetings; and
creation of citizens’ management principles. Sierra Club has been active
in lobbying CDF, the Board of Forestry, and State and local elected
officials, In 1997, former CDF Director Richard Wilson appointed a
Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC), After more than a year of meetings, in
late 1998 they released Recommendations, which mostly have not been
implemented. Recently, the Campaign to Restore Jackson Redwood Forest was
created, hoping to restore the whole forest to old growth, The Campaign
took CDF to court, which granted an injunction prohibiting logging until
a new Management Plan was in place, CDF is now eager to complete the Plan
so it can resume logging, The new plan is likely to guide management for
at least the next ten years.
Commenting on the Plan
The legislative mandate and Board of Forestry policies regarding
Jackson provide both challenges and opportunities for those wanting to
comment on the Plan and the EIR, Board policy states, "Timber
production shall be the primary land use on Jackson." A second policy
states, "the primary purpose of State Forests is to conduct
demonstrations, investigations, and education in forest management."
These policies reflect commonly held interpretations of existing law, CDF
will likely cite these laws and policies to assert that it cannot
eliminate the commercial logging program, Others would challenge those
interpretations,
Some see Jackson as a potential showcase for how logging ought to be
done, While recognizing that some areas are too sensitive to be included
in the timber program, they believe that Jackson ought to demonstrate
that logging can be profitable without clearcuts, even-aged management,
herbicides, bad roads, and massive slash piles, The Wilson-era Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) recommended that
approach,
There is, however, consensus regarding many high priority issues,
Research and demonstration regarding forest management is clearly central
to Jackson’s mandate and comments should reflect that, All comments
should include:
- Jackson Forest is regionally important, It is a key refuge for
maintaining the biodiversity of the redwood region and is an outdoor
recreation resource for millions of people.
- The entire forest should demonstrate how to manage for recovery of
native plants and animals that have declined in the region and how to
maintain and restore pristine water quality,
- To maximize research opportunities, every old growth tree should be
protected, and stands containing even a few old growth trees should not
be logged, Old growth development areas around the already-designated
old growth groves should be expanded.
- The 10,000-12,000 acres of 80 to 110 year old second growth provide
a unique opportunity to conduct controlled research on how best to
accelerate the development of older forest characteristics and should
be designated solely for that purpose,
- Stream-side buffers should be greatly increased, creating a network
of wildlife corridors, Management within these zones should be limited
to demonstrating conservation of native plants, fish, and wildlife,
- If logging is to continue, the timber program’s overall goal should
be to show how logging can coexist with the public’s enjoyment of the
forest, Jackson should demonstrate only sustained yield, single tree
and small cluster selection logging, the highest quality road building,
and enhanced site clean-up, There should be no even-aged management,
clearcuts, or herbicide use for site preparation.
CDF management in Sacramento wants the Management Plan done so logging
can proceed, A massive public outpouring of support for Jackson Forest
and true reform of its management will be necessary to change CDF’s
direction, Please send your comments to CDF as soon as possible. They must be received by CDF
prior to July 19.
Comments should be mailed to:
Chris Rowney, Deputy Chief for State Forests
CDF
PO Box 944246
Sacramento, CA 94244
Or faxed to Rowney at:
916-653-8957 (Note: faxes may not be accepted by
CDF)
For sample comment letters, updates, and additional information on the
Jackson State Forest Management Plan and EIR, visit