|Published on September 4, 2004
© 2004- The Press Democrat
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
After three years of legal wrangling, logging in Jackson State
Demonstration Forest could resume next year if Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
approves legislation authored by Sen. Wes Chesbro, D-Arcata.
Supported by the Sierra Club of California and other environmental
groups, the law would create a citizens advisory committee that would have
a voice on timber harvest plans in Jackson forest.
The creation of the advisory panel would pave the way for the state to
harvest 20,000 to 25,000 trees a year at Jackson forest, bringing in $3
million to $5 million in revenues for the state.
``Clearly a change was needed,'' Chesbro said. ``There is a history of
failure between the timber industry and environmentalists. I don't believe
that we have to choose between protecting the forest and having a
productive timber economy.''
But SB1648 has raised the ire of the state Department of Forestry and
timber industry officials who call it a step backward in the years-long
debate over the management of the largest demonstration forest in the
Schwarzenegger has until the end of the month to sign or veto the bill.
If he fails to do either, it will automatically become law.
``We think it (the bill) will actually delay timber harvesting on
JDSF,'' said Rob Egel, chief of legislation for state forestry department.
There has been virtually no logging for two years on Jackson State
Forest's 50,000 acres east of Fort Bragg because of lawsuits claiming
mismanagement and inadequate environmental reviews of the forest's logging
plan. The work stoppage has meant the loss of millions to state forestry
The state has sold $8 million to $11 million in timber annually from
the forest, with proceeds pumped back into forest operations and public
recreation facilities. With logging operations halted, Jackson has lost
its primary source of income.
CDF officials said Chesbro's bill could actually delay the resumption
of logging at Jackson forest, not accelerate it.
State forest regulators have updated their environmental impact reports
and management plan, potentially clearing the way for Mendocino County
Superior Court to allow the resumption of logging next spring. Chesbro's
legislation, if passed, would alter requirements, add a layer of review
and could delay that timeline, Egel said.
The law would create a nine-member citizens advisory committee to weigh
in on forest management decisions made by the state -- an element endorsed
by the Sierra Club, but roundly criticized by the timber industry.
``If the state chooses to ignore the advisory committee, they have to
tell them why,'' said Paul Mason, forestry representative for the Sierra
Club. ``I think there is a little bit of incentive for the state to take
the recommendations seriously, but it doesn't tie their hands.''
But state forestry officials say the advisory committee is duplicative.
``It's yet another review process which, in our view, is totally
unnecessary. All they have done is actually create another bureaucratic
layer,'' said Chris Rowney, deputy chief in charge of state demonstration
forest programs for CDF.
William Keye, government affairs specialist for the California Licensed
Foresters Association, said the committee is given ``excessive powers'' in
the legislation, even though its original veto power was removed from the
bill's final language.
``What it says is this advisory committee is in charge of the forest,''
he said. ``My hunch is that the governor will say no.''
But Chesbro argued an advisory committee is crucial to breaking the
legal logjam that has blocked logging operations at Jackson forest for two
``The legislation does not give the advisory committee veto power, but
it does get the Department of Forestry to take public input more
seriously,'' he said. ``I'm trying to get the department to be more
responsive to the wide array of concerns of the public on a public
You can reach Staff Writer Kerry Benefield at 526-8671 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Keywords: LEGISLATION TIMBER ENVIRONMENT
© The Press Democrat. For copyright information visit our User
Agreement page at